this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
201 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

7150 readers
478 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nine million Canadians worry about where their next meal will come from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

A "Groceries and Essentials Benefit" is basically a wage subsidy, and you can bet the grocery chains would raise prices by just a little less than the benefit, and if it's like food stamps in the US, it'll be chipped away at and rendered humiliating and useless.

We've seen this play out with gas tax reductions: resellers know a lot about price elasticity, and any savings from a tax cut gets quickly eaten up by price increases.

Here's what we could do:

  • Tax the rich until we can afford to pay for services again
  • Raise marginal and corporate rates, forcing companies to re-invest instead of hoarding profits
  • Make stock buybacks illegal
  • Significantly raise capital gains taxes
  • (this is tricky) find a way to tax net worth as income
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if we had actual competition they'd be forced to pull their prices right back down again competing with each other.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lowering prices is only one possible outcome of competition though. So is lower product quality, and laying off workers. In general, cutting costs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Doesn't that suggest they'd get more market share by having worse quality, somehow?

Companies do all those things, and not always for good reason, but let's get our econ 101 ducks in a row a bit. I don't think it's because of competition for buyers.