this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
958 points (96.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12215 readers
1555 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

For anybody looking for attribution, this comic no longer exists. It was called Pictures for Sad Children, and it’s essentially lost media now after the creator had some issues and took everything (including IA backups) offline.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Do you know if that's all of it? According to wikipedia, there was a book that someone was mailing around to anyone who wanted to read it and eventually people scanned it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Oh my god I didn't know it was still up anywhere. I regret not getting a copy of the book way back when but I was a student and had no money. It was a very good comic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Holy damn I just couldn't stop reading.

[–] HowManyNimons 2 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ahhh thanks for this!! For years I've specifically tried to find a comic about a cloud... Very simple but really affected me emotionally. Just a drawing of a cloud over and over with captions like "this is a cloud I drew" "I hope you like it" "I hope it makes your day better" or something.

99% sure this is the author. I thought I was going crazy since nothing ever gets deleted from the Internet, so I also appreciate the explanation.

About to dive into the archive someone else posted now to find i that cloud.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

What? That was one of my favourites :(

[–] [email protected] 84 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Always a struggle for me. I saw Canada's demo CF-18 at an airshow a few years back and was having simultaneous thoughts of "so this is why we can't afford clean water for our indigenous communities" and "HOLY SHIT IT SOUNDS SO COOL".

[–] Wogi 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Frequently those problems could be solved for the cost of a single aircraft.

You can't afford clean water for indigenous people because they couldn't buy one fewer aircraft.

You needed all 138.

[–] PunnyName 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Can't afford clean water for indigenous people when you want to exterminate indigenous people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

You don't need planes for that. You just need a systematic foot on their necks. You know, like we do for the rest of the poors.

We can't afford another plane because we need another highway first.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see military spending as a necessary evil, it's like paying your insurance policy against the evils in the world. There will always be someone with a stick willing to beat someone weaker than them. So you could theoretically spend that military money on something "more useful", but if all your friends do that as well, you won't be able to enjoy that nice world for very long.

Also, people usually highly overrate how much a country spends on defense and underrate how much is spent on social security. Where I live, in Belgium, with a similar military budget as Canada (in terms of % of GDP) they did a survey once and asked people to estimate how many euros out of €100 of tax money went to the military and other things. People on average thought it was €6.1 to the military and €17.4 to social security. In reality the proportions are just €1.3 to the military and €37.5 to social security.

So I guess what I'm saying is: it's okay to enjoy the cool noises without guilt. You paid for it, it's necessary, and at least they're providing people with some entertainment now.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Canadians and Belgians can probably feel okay. As an American I'm disgusted by the waste. But that's kind of our bag and there's a long list of things that we waste money on.

[–] IzzyJ 2 points 1 day ago

America is a very unique case with these metrics, but its wortj noting most of our allies can also skimp on defense for the same reason. Whether thats worth it or not is a more political question

[–] General_Effort 1 points 2 days ago

Huh. What a weird coincidence. Out of all the many communities in Canada, it just happens to be the indigenous ones that have to make do without clean water because of military spending. What are the odds?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

i always find these kind of statements and comics weird, because like.

If the plane is your own, this would also signal the sound of protection and defense, which is an objectively good thing, if we're classifying dying due to a plane as a bad thing.

There are two sides to the coin and i guess this is either shitposting memes, or people never think about the fact that like, you can also just have a military.

[–] BreadOven 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I can't remember the exact title, but I think it's by Robert Blake. But the line is something like "a terrorist to me is a freedom fighter to you".

Definitely two sides to most things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter

[–] BreadOven 1 points 1 hour ago

I found the song. It's "Marching" by Robert Blake. But yeah. That's what he's saying in the song.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Most people don't like living near even civilian airports. Active duty flights would've usually happened nearer to the front, and modern flights often happen from aircraft carriers anyway.

Much more common for people to hear are shows of force, like the States do for holidays, airshows, and large sports games.

The comic is making fun of the fact that an airshow idolizes machines of war. Not all airshows focus on military craft, but most of them do, often being held at military airbases.

As cool as they are, it's good to remember that those machines are instruments of death, and often used against people of no immediate threat. Regardless of the necessity, I don't think that's something to cheer for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

modern flights often happen from aircraft carriers anyway

Eh, no?

Aircraft carriers are ridiculously complicated and expensive, hence even the us only having around a dozen or so? Russia famously has none. Great Brittain has like 2 or so, France like 1?

Its been a while, I don't remember the exact numbers, but the number of aircraft carriers in the world would be in the very low dozens because they're damn near unaffordably expensive.

The beyond vast majority of modern flights still happen from airports

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I had meant flights of U.S. planes, but you're right, they usually use and establish local airfields, and probably only use carriers where that's too slow or impossible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Also, none have been lost in battle since WW2.

They're basically mobile island outposts at this point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (11 children)

I live sandwiched between military bases of all branches. I've lived with the sounds of warplanes and target practice most of my entire life.

These bases cut swathes through tribal lands, leaving whole areas uninhabitable due to live ordnance.

I knew some kids from the reservations and I'll never forget how casually they'd say with every blast they're reminded that they're occupied.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] scarilog 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's ironic, the pinnacle of human engineering in our war machines. But these technologies wouldn't exist if they weren't created for the war machines in the first place. Sad.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's definitely an interdependancy there, but don't discount the incredible complexity of some cool civilan tech: James Webb Space Telescope, Mars rovers, ISS, the old Space Shuttle. Even mundane things like ocean-based oil rigs are chock full of amazing engineering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

GPS is literally from the concept of nuking the USSR. Thank your ass the cold war happened the next time you get lost, it's the only reason you aren't lost now.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

RIP pictures for sad children

[–] fishos 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm really torn on this one. They were a great comic that reached a lot of people and then the creator went on all these rants about not really being depressed and it was all a show(and I swear they then retracted that but Wikipedia doesn't seem to have that part listed). Then they burned their books and swore off creating and wanted everything removed. But then the book burning was even staged.....

For someone who claimed it was all an act, it sure seemed like coming clean was a mental breakdown in itself to me. Like they had imposter syndrome, but then the irony was yeah, you are as dysfunctional as you "pretended" to be and just demonstrated it to everyone. There was no imposter.

That's all to say I wish they'd kept creating and hadn't left like that. Hadn't basically said "this all sucks and shouldn't exist". But oddly, it is fitting. I'll give them that. Viewed as a whole, it's almost poetic.

ETA: I found a summary of the drama that included a mention of them retracting their claim of being depressed. I swear it was blog post called something like "I lied about lying about having depression", a follow up to "I lied about having depression". In the second post they claimed coming out as not depressed was in itself fake and I believe part of some art piece/experiment. The OP of the linked post adds a few details I'd missed. I don't disagree with their posit that it was all an art project and Campbell isn't a real person. I've certainly considered something similar in the past.

https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/a4t8s0/pictures_for_sad_children_a_summary_and_thoughts/

ETA2: Found an even better writeup with some more current details. There's this gem tho:

Two days later, Veil posted again: “I’VE BEEN PRETENDING TO BE PRETENDING TO HAVE DEPRESSION FOR PROFIT AND I’M SORRY.” A day later: “IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PRETEND TO DO OR SAY ANYTHING AND MY COMICS HAVE NEVER BEEN ABOUT DEPRESSION.”

https://www.inverse.com/input/culture/pictures-for-sad-children-webcomic-simone-veil-interview

[–] flicker 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This sort of thing is so... annoying.

An art exhibition of a fake person having a breakdown who has imposter syndrome that itself proves the depression isn't art to me. It doesn't make me consider the world, or my place in it. It doesn't evoke nihilism or humility or philosophy. It's just... annoying. Marketing depression. Dishonestly.

I say this as someone with treatment resistant chronic major depressive disease. As someone who was first hospitalized for suicide in middle school.

Compare this garbage with hyperbole and a half and their honesty and their struggles and their openness and it's...

Burning a copy of a book you sold to someone when they dare to email you asking for it? Fuck that.

[–] fishos 8 points 2 days ago

Thank you for your comment. I thought of Hyperbole when I was writing mine. I have the same feeling about how they handled their struggles in a much healthier and constructive way. I've sent people their post on depression before to help explain my own feelings. I'm glad to know it resonated with others as well.

Campbell left a really bad taste in my mouth. It's one of the few times I've been successfully able to completely sever the art and artist. I love the work, but kinda deplore Campbell. I don't really want to give them any credit because they don't even want it themselves.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 11 points 2 days ago

I really like airplanes, especially the historic ones. The speed and sound is amazing. The engineering and skill in building and operating those aircraft is top-tier.

However, the airshows often extoll the fear and damage the aircraft can do to their targets, especially the modern ones. Really not interested in the bodycount or terror these aircraft inspire, but plenty of people enjoy the flex.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The allied forces planes (all made by america by the way, the lancaster is a british knock-off of the B17) were killing the members of the Axis forces, like the ukrainians and the Italians and the Germans that became nazis

[–] scholar 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What on earth are you on about?

[–] IzzyJ 1 points 1 day ago

The 40s ones are based because it was fascists getting bombed

load more comments
view more: next ›