this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
914 points (98.0% liked)

Facepalm

186 readers
1 users here now

Anything that makes you apply your hand to your face.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/10145550

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 239 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You know what the one thing a wheelchair-bound person never needs?

A fucking chair.

[–] jumjummy 74 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, you see, it’s not a full chair, just the backrest. Just in case their wheelchair backrest needs to rest.

[–] frunch 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, and here i was thinking they found a way to cut costs on wheelchairs by removing the backs -- necessitating these backless-wheelchair-accessible-wheelchair-backs for those that need to give their backs a break.

[–] DillyDaily 3 points 1 month ago

Backless and low back wheelchairs are definitely a thing, though fortunately not for cost savings, but for better mobility for the user.

If you have really good T-spine mobility and control, it can sometimes be beneficial to get rid of the back of your chair, giving you more range to twist, turn, and lean from the hips.

With enough upper body strength, If you go for a lightweight no back chair with tip wheels, strap in, and get some durable gloves, you can even do full cartwheels in a wheelchair.

Obviously whether a backless chair is appropriate is very individual and a physiotherapist and occupational therapist will need to help assess.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

You know what wheelchair users also sometimes like to do in the middle of a long day?

Fucking lie down.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They do, though. Most tables don't sport the room underneath to allow a wheelchair, this if one goes out for dining, one needs to transfer to a regular chair.

If possible ofc, but it sincerely limits the scope of restaurants you can visit if you can't switch seats.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

i always wondered why the arms of wheelchairs weren't adjustable/removable. It seems like it would be a smart thing to implement. I can move my office chair arms up and down, forward and backwards, i even have about 30° of rotation available

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol as if people couldn't just park their wheelchair beside the bench

[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is what title says yep

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I actually have title blindness. It's a super rare condition

[–] pigup 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I pray for you and your family 🙏

[–] frunch 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

1 like = 3 prayers (exclusive offer)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Where do the thots come in

[–] bandwidthcrisis 15 points 1 month ago

Do you need a special bench for that?

[–] EvolvedTurtle 12 points 1 month ago

I didn't know there was a diagnosis for this I should get myself checked

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Haha! LTS can't see me talking about them! I hear they never know what book they're reading...

[–] Visstix 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What exactly does that back part do for someone sitting on a chair?

[–] SpaceNoodle 90 points 1 month ago

It holds the little sign up

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It might prevent some asshole from walking up behind them and just start wheeling them somewhere.

[–] Quetzalcutlass 48 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

That's also what brakes are for. But in case a human going with the person in a wheelchair wants/ has to push the wheelchair this also makes it so much more difficult to get in/out of.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

A wheelchair's backrest does not have zero depth, so with this design the rollchair user has to sit slightly in front of the people on the left and right. Utter shit.

[–] modus 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What would the symbol for "no homeless" look like? A house crossed out twice?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What would the symbol for “no homeless” look like?

✝️

[–] GraniteM 5 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You know, in theory

[–] GelatinGeorge 5 points 1 month ago

That's the first time I've ever double-taked a sentence before. Nice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

🏠 inside 🚫 inside another 🚫 ?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

I have never seen anything like that before. Looks ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This feels like a disguised way to not let people sleep on the bench.

[–] SpaceNoodle 71 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what the text says.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow, I completely erased that part of the image from my mind.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What does it say on the bottom? I don't know how to read.

[–] EvolvedTurtle 4 points 1 month ago

Idk man I'm struggling too

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's possible/probable that it was a dick move by some planning committee. But if I were wheelchair bound, I could imagine that being a) acknowledged and b) in the middle


instead of always off to the side


could be nice.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago

How many wheelchair users have backless chairs? Like, this isn't even a good design if it WAS actually intended for them. With that back part any wheelchair user would end up sitting slightly forward from the people sitting on the actual bench seat, possibly a good 6+ inches forward if it bumps into the handles on the back.

[–] Inucune 14 points 1 month ago

Hostile architecture

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

this is what we call, excessively stupid design.

It could be both disability accessible, and just, a fucking bench, because benches have always been accessibility enabled, because they're fucking benches.

[–] ALilOff 11 points 1 month ago

“2 guys sitting on a bench 2 feet apart cause they’re not gay “

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Just freaking make single chairs. Stop making weird benches. If you want a bench, make a bench. Someone might lay on it. If you don't want a bench, Christ on a cracker, don't make a weird bench! Just make chairs!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I can already imagine someone raving about this fantastic design on LinkedIn

[–] auzy 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah.. I'm surprised by how commonly people repost this everywhere.

If you want to include them, they can also sit across from the bench.... Or next to it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Sometimes the dumbest things are done by thoughtful people "Just trying to help"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

They don't need a backrest 🤦‍♂️

load more comments
view more: next ›