this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
138 points (97.9% liked)

Open Source

30511 readers
631 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If proprietary app is better and more robust I am willing to try it and assess it myself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I'm just migrating away from github because of this. Sr.ht is looking promising.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why would you not want to use 2FA?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I know it is an unpopular opinion, but it is a huge headache in general. I don't think the theoretical benefits (which make total sense) actually pay off in reality and are worth the extra headache. I'm not saying they should not have it at all, but it should be at least opt-out instead of forced.

In the case of github, I think it is part of their long drawn out plan of data collection and proprietary lock down. Next they are going to require your house address and government ID. I feel better using an free and open source platform anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well, if you use a password manager such as bitwarden you can store your 2FA one ctrl-v away. Even if this is a less secure setup, that still prevents someone eavesdropping on your password from reusing it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)