this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
979 points (98.4% liked)
linuxmemes
20920 readers
2166 users here now
I use Arch btw
Sister communities:
- LemmyMemes: Memes
- LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
- RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts
Community rules
- Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
- Be civil
- Post Linux-related content
- No recent reposts
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The answer is very much "Don't run Photoshop"
(Fuck Adobe. There, I said it)
"It is always ethical to pirate adobe"
It's never unethical to pirate Adobe, but it's always more ethical to use Free Software instead and deny Adobe the mindshare.
It's far more ethical to make the company lose money
Minimum amount for photoshop is 22$/month
Pirate photoshop
Delete it
Pirate again
Repeat 30 times
Adobe looses 660$
If everyone does this adobe will loose so much
Investors hate this one glitch!
They don't care as they have a massive profit margin. What matters more is the market share. You got to break the standard way of thinking industry wide.
That's not at all how piracy works. They don't lose any money by me not buying their product, the money was never theirs to lose. They can earn money if I buy it, but if I don't, then nothing changed. It's not like every company is entitled to my money.
Pirating or using Gimp or Krita instead, has the exact same effect on them, ie me not buying their product.
You must be fun at parties.
Lol I've been using cs5 until yesterday. V24 now
Gimp is behind on features and ui optimisation and krita is art focused
Voice of reason
I never understood that argument. Do or do not.